How execution-ready is your technology team?

Consistently on time

Commitments are met predictably, release after release.

Mostly on time

Timelines are hit more often than not.

Frequently slips

Deadlines move regularly and stakeholders expect it.

Rarely predictable

We struggle to forecast or hit delivery dates.

Strong and resilient

We absorb new priorities without derailing delivery.

Adequate but fragile

We manage, but one competing priority disrupts everything.

Stretched thin

Most initiatives compete for the same few people.

Constantly overloaded

Capacity is a bottleneck on nearly every initiative.

Tightly aligned

Strategy flows cleanly into execution and results.

Generally aligned

Strategy reaches delivery, but with friction.

Loosely connected

Strategy and delivery often drift apart.

Disconnected

Delivery rarely reflects stated strategy.

Highly accountable

Partners deliver consistently and own outcomes.

Good but inconsistent

Strong results, but difficult to scale or repeat.

Unreliable

Outcomes depend heavily on who is staffed.

A liability

Partner delivery creates more risk than value.

More than 80%

The roadmap is a reliable plan of record.

60–80%

Most of it delivered, with some slippage.

40–60%

Roughly half the roadmap makes it to production.

Less than 40%

The roadmap is more aspiration than commitment.

Modern and scalable

Infrastructure accelerates rather than constrains delivery.

Mostly solid

Generally healthy with isolated areas of concern.

Needs modernization

Known debt is slowing delivery velocity.

Significant constraint

Legacy systems actively block progress.

Very stable

Low churn, clear ownership, steady leadership.

Generally stable

Occasional change, but well absorbed.

Moderate: on our radar

Planning ahead but not in crisis mode.

In flux

Frequent reorganization or turnover disrupts delivery.